Title and statement of responsibility area
Title proper
General material designation
Graphic material
Parallel title
Other title information
Title statements of responsibility
Title notes
Level of description
Reference code
Edition area
Edition statement
Edition statement of responsibility
Class of material specific details area
Statement of scale (cartographic)
Statement of projection (cartographic)
Statement of coordinates (cartographic)
Statement of scale (architectural)
Issuing jurisdiction and denomination (philatelic)
Dates of creation area
Date(s)
-
December 05, 1953 (Creation)
Physical description area
Physical description
2 photographs : b&w negatives ; 8 x 10 cm and 10 x 8 cm
Publisher's series area
Title proper of publisher's series
Parallel titles of publisher's series
Other title information of publisher's series
Statement of responsibility relating to publisher's series
Numbering within publisher's series
Note on publisher's series
Archival description area
Name of creator
Custodial history
Scope and content
Notes area
Physical condition
Immediate source of acquisition
Arrangement
Language of material
Script of material
Location of originals
Availability of other formats
Restrictions on access
Terms governing use, reproduction, and publication
Public Domain
Finding aids
Associated materials
Accruals
General note
53-5110_001 and 53-5110_002 appeared on Page 3 of the Monday, March 1, 1953 edition of the newspaper.
General note
Photo caption from published versions of 53-5110_001 and 53-5110_002: "CARVES LEATHER - Fred Steel of Preston (top photo) [53-5110_001] has mastered rare leather-carving craft. Over 100 hours of work with tiny knives is used to make a purse like those shown [53-5110_002]. An invalid, Mr. Steel is one of few Canadians who can do work of top calibre."
General note
"Invalid" is an outdated and pejorative term used historically to refer to individuals with a physical disability. The use of the term in the photo caption has been maintained in keeping with Special Collections & Archives’ approach to language in archival descriptions, which prioritizes speaking openly about and clearly identifying problematic, harmful, and otherwise offensive records in the department’s holdings. This approach, while potentially upsetting, allows for the critical assessment and questioning of historical material by contemporary researchers.